Search Results for "Employees' Compensation Act, 1923"

242 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 242 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal in Employee Compensation Case - Assault by Employer Not Compensable Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 as It Does Not Constitute an 'Accident'

The appellants, legal representatives of Swamy, filed an appeal against the dismissal of their compensation claim under the Employee's Compensation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order Under Section 10-A of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 — Summary Deposit Cannot Be Ordered When Employer Denies Liability. Employer-Employee Relationship Disputed, Commissioner Must Follow Regular Procedure Under the Act.

The Petitioner, Prompt Landmarks Pvt. Ltd., a construction company, challenged an order dated 4 May 2013 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Workman's Appeal in Employee's Compensation Case, Directing Interest on Medical Expenses. Interest Held Payable at 12% from Date of Accident Under Section 4-A(3)(a) of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 Despite No Disability Award.

The dispute originated from a claim petition filed by the appellant, a workman employed as a loadman with the first respondent, who sustained injuries...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Adjudicates Employer’s Appeal Under Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Challenging Compensation Order. Death of Employee from Coronary Artery Disease While on Duty Raises Question of Liability Under the Act.

The provided judgment text is incomplete and covers only the initial factual background and procedural posture. The appellant, M/s.NLC India Limited (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Employee in Motor Vehicle Accident under Employees Compensation Act, 1923. The court held that the Commissioner erred in applying a multiplier of 200 and not considering future prospects, and recomputed compensation using the multiplier method.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same accident. The first appeal (MFA No. 102389/2017) is filed by the legal representatives of the dece...