Search Results for "Electricity refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Electricity refund"

240 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 240 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows JSW Steel's Challenge to Electricity Duty Demand on Captive Consumption. Held that electricity generated from captive power plant and consumed for own use is not 'sold' and thus not exigible to electricity duty under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, a company engaged in steel manufacturing, operates a captive power plant (CPP) at its factory in Raigad, Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

16 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petition Against CGRF Order in Electricity Connection Cost Refund Dispute. Distribution Licensee Not Obligated to Refund Infrastructure Costs for Dedicated Distribution Transformer Under Electricity Act, 2003.

22 Jan 2021

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), a Distribution Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003, filed thre...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Duty on Captive Consumption — Industrial Consumers Not Entitled to Exemption Under Section 3(1)(b) of Goa Electricity Duty Act, 1985 as Self-Generated Electricity Not Supplied by Licensee or Generating Company.

30 Dec 2020

The petitioners, a group of industrial companies and their directors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 2020

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee in Standby Charges Dispute with Another Licensee — Standby Charges Fixed by Government Order and Principles of Agreement Held Binding. The court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's order that TPC could not recover standby charges beyond Rs.3.5 crores per month from BSES/REL for the 275 MVA facility, as per the Government of Maharashtra's order dated 19.1.1998 and the Principles of Agreement dated 30.1.1998.

2 May 2019

The case involves a dispute between Tata Power Company Ltd. (TPC), a distribution licensee supplying electricity to the entire city of Mumbai, and Ada...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to KERC Order on Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access Industrial Consumers. Cross-Subsidy Surcharge Upheld as Valid Regulatory Measure Under Sections 42, 61, 62, 86 of Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Star Metallics and Power Private Limited, an industrial consumer of electricity, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case. Principles of Unjust Enrichment Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 Not Applicable to Refund Arising on Finalisation of Provisional Assessment.

20 Dec 2005

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai II appealed against the order of the appellate authorities below which allowed the refund claim of M/s. Sta...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)