Search Results for "EPF Act Coverage"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "EPF Act Coverage"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPFO Appeal Against HMT Limited in Provident Fund Dues Recovery Case — Establishes That Public Sector Undertakings Are Not Exempt from EPF Act Coverage and Recovery Proceedings. The Court Held That the EPF Act Applies to All Establishments Covered Under Section 1(3) and That the Respondent's Financial Difficulties Do Not Bar Recovery of Statutory Dues.

27 Jun 2023

The case involves an appeal filed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Recovery Officer of the Employees' Provident Fund Organization (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Private Security Agency Against EPF Coverage — Security Guards Held Employees of Agency, Not Clients. The court held that a private security agency providing security guards on payment basis is covered under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, as it renders expert services under G.S.R. 805 dated 17.05.1971.

2 Dec 2020

The appellant, M/s. Panther Security Service Private Limited, is a private security agency registered under the Private Security Agencies (Regulation)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Transfer of Employees Under EPF Act — Transfer of Employees to Subsidiary Not a 'Transfer of Establishment' Under Section 7A of EPF Act

14 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Aviation Karmachari Sanghatana, a trade union representing employees of Pawan Hans Ltd. (respondent no.1), filed a writ petition chall...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Employer Seeking Exclusion of Retired Railway Employees from EPF Coverage. Retired Employees Who Withdrew Full GPF Accumulations Are Not 'Excluded Employees' Under Paragraph 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, as the Term 'Fund' Refers Only to the EPF Fund Established Under the Act.

26 Mar 2019

The case involves an appeal by Modern Transportation Consultation Services Pvt. Ltd. and its director against the judgment of the Division Bench of th...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes EPF Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Employer Denied Opportunity to Cross-Examine Enforcement Officer. Section 7A of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 requires quasi-judicial authority to provide opportunity to cross-examine witnesses whose statements are relied upon.

3 Feb 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Steel Strong Valves (I) Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in valve manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to PF Act Notification for Establishment with Multiple Units. Single establishment determination under Section 2A of EPF Act requires functional integrity test, not mere geographical distance.

24 Aug 2006

The petitioner, Kay Iron Works Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, with its registered office at Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Provident Fund Demand — Taj Residency Held Separate Establishment Entitled to Infancy Benefit Under Section 16(1)(d) of EPF Act. The court held that the Taj Residency, Nasik was a newly established hotel with separate identity and not a branch of Hotel President, Mumbai, and thus entitled to infancy protection under Section 16(1)(d) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

11 Feb 2011

The petitioners, Piem Hotels Limited and another, challenged an order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) dated 31 March 1999, which he...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging PF Coverage for Establishment with 20 Employees Including Contractual Security Guards. Security guards engaged through agency are employees of the principal establishment for PF coverage under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

5 Jul 2017

The petitioner, M/s Silicon Cortec, challenged the order dated 03.10.2005 passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner and the subsequent order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes PF Orders for Violation of Natural Justice in M/s Ashmit Motors Case. Orders under Sections 7A and 7B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 set aside as passed without hearing the establishment.

19 Sep 2016

The petitioner, M/s Ashmit Motors Private Limited, a car dealership, challenged two orders passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner: (1) an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows EPFO's Writ Petitions Against Educational Institution and Financial Company for Non-Compliance with Provident Fund Dues. EPF Act Sections 7A and 7B Proceedings Upheld as Proper Exercise of Quasi-Judicial Authority.

16 Dec 2025

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by the Central Board of Trustee, Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) against M/s. Saket Coll...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)