Search Results for "EIA Notification 1994"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NGT Order Quashing Environmental Clearance for Peripheral Ring Road Due to Stale EIA Data. Primary Data Collected Over Three Years Before Submission Invalidates Clearance Under EIA Notification 2006.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 8 February 2019 quashing the Environmental Clearance (EC) granted to the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NGT Decision Quashing Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances Under EIA Notification 1994. Circular dated 14 May 2002 Allowing Retrospective Clearances Held Invalid as Prior Environmental Clearance is Mandatory Under Section 3 of Environment Protection Act 1986.

The case involves appeals against the judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 8 January 2016, which quashed a circular issued by the Union...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Prohibition on Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance in Environmental Law Case. Prior Environmental Clearance Under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and EIA Notification 2006 is Mandatory; Ex Post Facto Clearance Ultra Vires.

The Supreme Court of India considered a group of petitions challenging the validity of ex post facto environmental clearance (EC) granted under the En...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Environmental Clearance for Iron Ore Mine Expansion. Deletion of Time Condition by Competent Authority Held Valid, Mining Operations Not Illegal.

The petitioner, Shankar Raghunath Jog, a retired government servant and resident of Sancordem, Goa, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Steel Plant Operation Under Pollution Board Supervision Pending Environmental Clearance Compliance. The Court held that the High Court erred in discontinuing interim orders allowing operation under Board supervision, balancing environmental protection with livelihood concerns.

The case involves Electrosteel Steels Limited, which owns a 1.5 MTPA integrated steel plant in Bokaro, Jharkhand, employing 3,000 regular and 7,000 co...