Search Results for "Dishonest Adoption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Dishonest Adoption"

70 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance with Exemplary Costs for Suppression of Facts and Forum Shopping. Plaintiffs failed to disclose prior pending suit and obtained ex parte orders by misrepresentation, leading to dismissal and costs of Rs. 5 lakhs.

5 Mar 2018

The plaintiffs, Anand Agarwal and Pramila Anand Agarwal, filed a Commercial Suit No. 614 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court seeking specific perform...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Nov 2025

The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Despite Defendant's Preliminary Objections. Plaintiff's Mark 'ESSEL' Found to Have Acquired Distinctiveness and Defendant's Use Likely to Cause Confusion.

10 Mar 2016

The plaintiff, Essel Propack Ltd., filed a suit in 2010 against Essel Kitchenware Ltd. and another defendant for trademark infringement and passing of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

30 Nov -0001

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

31 Mar 2012

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Use of 'KATARIA INSURANCE' Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Marks 'KATARIA' and 'KATARIA INSURANCE CONSULTANCY' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

8 Dec 2025

The plaintiff, Bhavesh Suresh Kataria, proprietor of Kataria Jewellery Insurance Consultancy, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.

11 Mar 2015

The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit: Sun Pharma's 'SUN' Mark Protected Against 'ABSUN'. Deceptive similarity established as dominant feature 'SUN' is common; addition of prefix 'AB' insufficient to distinguish under Section 29(2)(b) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

22 Apr 2026

The plaintiff, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, Satej M. Katekar, proprietor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'HAYWARDS 5000' v. 'COX 5000'. The court held that the Plaintiff's registered trademarks 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'FIVE THOUSAND' were infringed by the Defendants' use of 'COX 5000', and the Defendants were restrained from using the impugned mark.

8 Dec 2025

The Plaintiff, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd., filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, Jagpin Brewerise Limited & Ors., fro...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)