Search Results for "Designs Act 1911"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Design Infringement Suit Transfer Case — Commercial Court at District Level Competent to Decide Cancellation of Design Under Section 22(4) of Designs Act, 2000. Transfer to High Court Not Mandatory Where High Court Lacks Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction.

The present appeal arose from a suit filed by the respondent, M/s. Mold Tek Packaging Ltd., against the appellant, S.D. Containers Indore, seeking a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against IPAB Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Patent Pre-Grant Opposition. Pre-grant opponent not heard before allowing patent appeal, order set aside and matter remanded.

The petitioner, Dhaval Diyora, filed a pre-grant opposition under Section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 against the patent application of Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Generic Religious Symbols Lack Originality. Artistic works depicting deities and religious symbols held not original under Copyright Act, 1957, as they are common to trade and generic.

The plaintiffs, Pranda Jewelry Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a suit for copyright infringement and passing off against Aarya 24 kt and others, alleging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Copyright Infringement Case for Technical Drawings of Flash Lights. Court holds that copyright subsists in technical drawings under Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957, and that reproduction in a three-dimensional form constitutes infringement.

The plaintiff, Photoquip India Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against Delhi Photo Store and Sunlight Industries, alleging that the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Cancellation of Design Registration in Hawkins Cookers Ltd. v. Zaverchand Liladhar Shah & Ors. — Petitioner Fails to Establish Novelty or Prior Publication of Registered Design of Tava Under Designs Act, 1911.

The petitioner, Hawkins Cookers Ltd., filed a miscellaneous petition under the Designs Act, 1911 seeking cancellation of design registration no.164949...