Search Results for "Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Tenants' Appeal in Rent Control Case — Striking Out Defence Not Automatic Under Section 15(7) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Discretionary Power Must Be Exercised Judiciously; Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Justify Striking Out Defence.

The case involves an appeal by tenants against the High Court of Delhi's order upholding the Rent Controller's decision to strike out their defence in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Acquisition of Alternative Residence by Tenant Not Ground for Eviction When Premises Let for Composite Purpose of Residence and Profession Under Section 14(1)(h).

The dispute originated from a tenancy entered into by an advocate, the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents, who took on rent certain premises f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Suit Against Occupant Who Had Ejectment Decree Not Executed Due to Slum Areas Act. Section 19 of Slum Areas Act Does Not Make Such Occupant a 'Tenant' Under Delhi Rent Control Act, Allowing Suit for Possession on Trespass Ground.

The appellant, Lakhmi Chand Khemani, was the tenant of a building in Delhi owned by one M. M filed a suit for ejectment and obtained a decree. While a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 13-B of East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for NRI Landlords in Chandigarh and Punjab. Constitutional validity of provision granting immediate possession to Non-Resident Indians upheld as reasonable classification under Article 14.

The appeals were filed by tenants challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Licence vs. Lease Determination Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947. Agreement for use of shop premises held to be a lease, not a licence, based on exclusive possession and intention of parties.

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by Messrs Miscellenary Marketers Pvt. Ltd. (defendants) against Messrs SunNSand Pvt. Ltd. (pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Licence vs. Lease Determination. Court upholds findings that agreement was a lease under Transfer of Property Act, not a licence, and that tenant sublet premises without consent, violating Bombay Rent Act.

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by Messrs Miscellenary Marketers Pvt. Ltd. (defendants) against Messrs SunNSand Pvt. Ltd. (pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit — Landlord Failed to Prove Bona Fide Need for Residential Premises Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenant's Use of Rear Rooms for Storage and Occasional Stay Did Not Constitute Subletting or Change of User.

The petitioner, a tenant, challenged the judgment and order dated 11th August 1999 passed by the Additional District Judge, Thane, which partly decree...