Search Results for "Delhi Development Authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Delhi Development Authority"

3133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3133 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant's Claim in Property Dispute Against DDA — Possession Does Not Confer Ownership After Valid Transfer to Successor Body. The Court upheld the High Court's order rejecting the appellant's claim over property in Khasra No. 958/29, as the property had been transferred to DDA by its predecessor, the Delhi Improvement Trust.

24 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a civil appeal filed by the appellant against the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and others. The appellant claimed poss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.

13 Jan 2026

The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Development Charges Under U.P. Urban Planning Act, Quashes Other Levies as Unauthorized. The Court holds that only development fees under Section 15(2-A) are valid, while inspection fee, sub-division charges, stacking charges, and impact fee imposed via executive orders under Section 41 are ultra vires and violative of Article 265.

28 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court disposed of a group of appeals arising from common judgment(s) of the Allahabad High Court concerning the validity of various demand...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Tenure Dispute, Reversing High Court on Urbanization Effect. The Court held that the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, continues to govern land rights even after a notification under Section 507(a) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, urbanizes the area, as the Land Reforms Act is a special law and its provisions are not automatically extinguished.

14 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi dated November 22, 2012, which held that upon issuance of a notifica...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

18 Dec 2018

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Cross Appeals Against Temporary Injunction Order in Suit by Co-operative Housing Society. Developer and Land Owner Challenge Order Restraining Construction and Use of FSI in Suit Alleging Breach of Development Obligations.

7 Apr 2016

The dispute arose from a development project known as Dosti Flamingos in Sewri, Mumbai. M/s. Dosti Corporation, a partnership firm, acted as developer...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)