Search Results for "Deemed Generation Incentive"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Generating Company and State Utility in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Deemed Generation Incentive Not Payable After 1995 Notification; Supplementary Agreement Bars Retrospective Interest on Deemed Loan.

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals arising from a common order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) concerning a power purchase agre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by State Power Entities Against APTEL Order Deleting Misdeclaration Penalty. Penalty for Misdeclaration of Declared Capacity Requires Proof of Intent or Negligence Under Punjab State Grid Code Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Punjab State Load Despatch Centre (PSLDC) and Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) against the judgment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Sales Tax Incentive Scheme. Retrospective Operation of Section 41B of Bombay Sales Tax Act and Rule 31AA Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Vested Rights.

The petitioners, M/s. Prasad Power Control Pvt. Limited and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 41B of the Bombay Sales Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee Against Tariff Revision for Change in Law Under Electricity Act, 2003. Non-Allocation of Coal Linkage Despite Government Assurance Constitutes Change in Law Entitling Generating Company to Compensatory Tariff.

The case involves a dispute between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), an electricity distribution licensee in Rajasthan, and Adani Power Raj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...