Search Results for "Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares"

7 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Application — Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares Held as Debt, Not Investment. The Court held that CRPS constitute a debt under Section 3(11) of IBC, 2016, and the appellant is a financial creditor entitled to file an application under Section 7.

9 Dec 2025

The appeal arises from the dismissal of the appellant's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by the NCLT and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Tender Dispute, Upholding Limited Judicial Review Under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The Court Reiterated That Judicial Interference in Tender Awards is Restricted to Cases of Arbitrariness or Irrationality, and Courts Must Defer to the Tendering Authority's Interpretation of Contract Terms.

17 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed a civil appeal concerning the scope of judicial review in tender matters under Article 226 of the Constitution. T...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Former Union Minister in PMLA Case — Economic Offence Bail Principles Reiterated. The court held that the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA are not absolute and must be applied with reference to the facts, and that once investigation is substantially complete, custodial interrogation is not necessary.

15 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of P. Chidambaram against the Delhi High Court's order denying him regular bail in a money laundering case regist...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal on Indexation Benefit for Redemption of Non-Cumulative Preference Shares. Redemption of preference shares is a 'transfer' under Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and indexation benefit under Section 48 is not available as preference shares are in the nature of debt.

27 Apr 2012

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arose from a decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 19 December...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses NCDC's Appeals in Income Tax Deduction Case — Dividends, Interest, and Service Charges Not 'Derived From' Long-Term Finance Business. The Court held that the restrictive phrase 'derived from' in Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, excludes ancillary income such as dividends, interest on deposits, and service charges from the deduction.

30 Nov -0001

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by the National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC) against the Assistant Commissioner of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order of Attachment Before Judgment in Commercial Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established. Court held that the balance of convenience did not favor the appellants and that the trial court's discretion in ordering attachment before judgment under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was not perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal against an order of attachment before judgment passed by the trial court in a commercial suit. The appellants, who were de...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)