Search Results for "Cross-objections"

Trending :

Search Results for "Cross-objections"

60 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute for Patent Illegality and Perversity. The court found that the arbitrator's interpretation of a condition subsequent in a share purchase agreement was patently illegal and perverse, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Mar 2019

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award arising from a share purchase agree...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BSNL's Appeal Against Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Reference Court's award of Rs.40 per sq ft for acquired land upheld as market value based on sale instances and location.

23 Jan 2019

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), the acquiring body, against the judgment of the Reference Court in L.A.C. No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Adoption and Hindu Women's Property Rights Case — Widow's Adoption in 1953 Does Not Extinguish Her Limited Estate Under Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937. The court held that the widow's adoption of a son does not divest her of the limited estate she inherited from her husband under the 1937 Act, and the adopted son does not acquire any right to the property during her lifetime.

19 Oct 2018

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court concerning the effect of adoption by a widow in 1953 on her rights under the Hindu Wome...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Appellate Court Erred in Modifying Decree Without Cross-Appeal. Order of Refund of Earnest Money Restored as Appellate Court Could Not Set Aside Relief Granted to Plaintiff in Absence of Cross-Objection Under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC.

5 Feb 2015

The appellant, Ghodganga Sakhar Karkhana, a registered cooperative society, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 12 August 1991...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Adverse Possession.

6 Dec 2013

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the 7th Additional District Judge, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition by Tenants in Eviction Suit — Landlord's Bonafide Need Not Proved. Requirement of Suit Premises for Business of Son-in-law Not Established as Bonafide Need Under Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

9 Aug 2011

This Civil Revision Application was filed by the original defendants/tenants, Smt. Gumfabai Dattalal Jaiswal and Pramod Dattalal Jaiswal, challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal, Holds CESTAT Has Power to Condon Delay Under Section 129A(5) of Customs Act, 1962. The Court Remanded the Matter for Consideration of Condonation of Delay on Merits, Ruling That Appeals Under Section 129D(3) Are Deemed Appeals Under Section 129A and Thus Subject to the Same Condonation Power.

13 Aug 2010

The Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai, filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) against an order of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tribunal's Refusal to Recall Order on Depreciation of Stock Exchange Membership Card. Court Holds That Reliance on Uncited Precedent Without Hearing Does Not Constitute a Mistake Apparent on Record Under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

5 May 2010

The petitioner, M/s Inventure Growth & Securities Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Inc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Reduces Enhanced Compensation from Rs.40,000 to Rs.25,000 per Acre. Claimants Failed to Prove Non-Agricultural Potential of Acquired Agricultural Land Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

7 Jan 2010

The case involves two appeals by the State of Maharashtra and cross-objections by the claimants against the judgment and award dated 6.12.1990 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Batch of First Appeals in Land Acquisition Matters — No Outcome Provided. Multiple First Appeals Filed by State of Maharashtra, Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation, and Landowners Seeking Enhancement/Reduction of Compensation.

1 Jan 1970

The judgment text provided only lists the title and case numbers of multiple First Appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction....

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)