Search Results for "Criminal Courts and Court Martial Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Criminal Courts and Court Martial Rules"

27 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Air Force Officer in Administrative Action Under Air Force Act, 1950. Administrative dismissal under Section 19 read with Rule 16 of Air Force Rules, 1969 is not barred by the three-year limitation period for court-martial under Section 121 of the Air Force Act, 1950, as limitation applies only to trial by court-martial, not to administrative proceedings.

15 Apr 2026

The dispute involved a former Indian Air Force officer challenging his dismissal from service under the Air Force Act, 1950. The appellant, commission...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Army Officer in POCSO Case. Judicial Review under Article 226 Limited to Jurisdictional Error; No Re-appreciation of Evidence.

17 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a retired Lieutenant Colonel in the Indian Army, was convicted by a General Court Martial (GCM) under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Army Offence Jurisdiction Dispute, Restoring Sessions Court Trial. Concurrent Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Army Act, 1950 Upheld, with Commanding Officer's Discretion Exercised Through Cooperation with Civil Investigation.

1 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Sikkim, which upheld an order of the Sessions Judge directing that the accused, an Army personne...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revision Application of Commanding Officer, INS Hansa, Seeking Transfer of Criminal Case to Navy Court. The Court held that when naval personnel are accused of offences triable by court-martial, the criminal court must deliver them to naval authorities under Section 78 of the Navy Act, 1957 read with Section 475 Cr.P.C.

8 Feb 2021

The present criminal revision application was filed by the Commanding Officer of INS Hansa, Dabolim, Goa, being aggrieved by the order dated 14.11.201...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Airman in Theft Case, Sets Aside Tribunal Order. Air Force Act is a Special Law; Registration of FIR Not Mandatory for Court Martial Proceedings.

17 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow, which had se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Quashing of General Court Martial Against Retired Army Officer in Procurement Irregularities Case. No Prima Facie Case Made Out as Evidence Lacked Intent to Defraud and Actions Were Within Authority's Discretion.

27 Nov 2019

The Union of India appealed against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, which quashed the order convening a General...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Summary Court Martial Case Due to Lack of Immediate Action Requirement. The Court held that the convening of a Summary Court Martial after a nine-month delay was contrary to Section 120 of the Army Act, 1950, and modified the punishment to discharge upon completion of fifteen years of service for pension eligibility.

8 Jul 2019

The appellant, Randhir Singh, was enrolled in the Indian Army on 29 October 1996 and was posted as Acting Lance Dafadar. On 11 August 2007, while on d...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Private Complaint Case Against Air Force Personnel — Proceedings Quashed for Lack of Sanction Under Section 124 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Altercation Over Vehicle Use at Air Force Station Held to Be in Discharge of Official Duty, Requiring Mandatory Sanction Before Cognizance.

4 Dec 2015

The appellant, a retired Sergeant from the Indian Air Force, filed a private complaint against the 1st respondent, a serving Warrant Officer, alleging...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Army Dismissal Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Summary Court Martial Conducted Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Army Rules 22-24 and Section 80 of Army Act, 1950 Renders Dismissal Void.

31 Oct 2014

The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, and other appellants challenged an order dated 5th September 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Court Martial Conviction for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence. Petitioner's thumb impression on payment vouchers not proved to be superimposed; conviction set aside.

6 Dec 2006

The petitioner, Major Anurag Pathak, was a Company Commander in the Indian Army. During his tenure in Bhutan (1993-96), he was later called upon to re...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)