Search Results for "Consumer Protection Act, 1986"

Trending :

Search Results for "Consumer Protection Act, 1986"

99 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 99 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

15 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case and Remands to NCDRC for Merits Decision. The Court held that deposit of surplus funds in a fixed deposit by a company does not automatically constitute commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, requiring examination of dominant intention, and allegations of fraud do not oust consumer forum jurisdiction if deficiency in service is alleged.

19 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment and order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 13.03.2023, which dismissed the appell...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Flat Possession -- NCDRC Orders Upheld for Completion, Compensation, and Costs Under Consumer Protection Act

20 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court addressed three civil appeals arising from NCDRC orders in consumer complaints filed by flat buyers against Parsvnath Developers Ltd...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute, Holds Flat Purchasers as Consumers Under Consumer Protection Act Despite Subsequent Leasing. NCDRC Decision Reversed and Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration

4 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants and Another against Respondents and Another -- The Court reversed the NCDRC's decision which ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute Over Flood vs. Seepage — Heavy Rainfall Causing Sudden Inundation Constitutes Flood, Not Seepage, Under Householder Insurance Policy. The court held that the insurer's repudiation based on 'seepage' was unjustified as the damage was caused by flood, a covered peril under the policy.

11 Jul 2025

The appellant, Gopal Dikshit, owned a premises in New Delhi insured with United India Insurance Company Ltd. under a Householder Insurance Policy vali...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

7 Apr 2025

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Insurance Claim Quantum. The Court Remands Matter to National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for Fresh Determination of Compensation Amount Due to Procedural Error in Evidence Consideration Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

7 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court heard an appeal filed by United India Insurance Co. Ltd. under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, challenging a judgme...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Facilitates Settlement in Consumer Dispute Involving Flat Buyers, Builder, and Bank Under Consumer Protection Act. Court Records Amicable Resolution Terms Including Waiver of Charges, Interest Discounts, and Payment Adjustments, Directing Compliance with Timelines.

25 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against a common judgment of the National Consumer Dispute...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

20 Mar 2025

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarified the Scope of Interim Moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Held That Regulatory Penalties Imposed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Are Not Covered

4 Mar 2025

Invoking Insolvency Proceedings Cannot stay execution of Penalty Orders for Consumer Protection Law Violations – The Apex Court Upheld the NCDRC’s...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)