Search Results for "Commissioner's Clarification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Commissioner's Clarification"

750 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 750 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows University Appeal in Increment Dispute Under UGC Scheme. Two Advance Increments Denied to Lecturer Holding Ph.D. on Placement as Selection Grade Lecturer Upheld.

10 May 2023

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which directed the Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit to grant two advance i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

20 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award in Smart City Project — No Material Irregularity Found in Evaluation Process. The court held that the tender committee's interpretation of bid terms was reasonable and not arbitrary, and declined to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution.

21 Mar 2019

The petitioner, NEC Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the decision of respondent No.1, Shivamogga Smart City Limited, to award a tender to resp...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Clarification Order and Section 60(8) of KVAT Act — Upholds Tax Rate of 14.5% on Diapers, Under-pads, and Sanitary Napkins. Commissioner's Clarification Overruling Advance Ruling Authority Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 60(8) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

23 Oct 2017

The petitioner, M/s Bella Premier Happy Hygiene Care Private Limited, a manufacturer of 'All-in-one Diapers, Under-pads and Sanitary Napkins', challen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in KVAT Act Classification Case — Mango Juc-Fit and Other Products Held to Be Fruit Products Under Entry 16 of Third Schedule. The Court ruled that the products are covered by the specific entry for fruit products and not unscheduled goods, reversing the Commissioner's revisional order.

27 Apr 2016

The appellant, M/s. Rasna Private Limited, a dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act), sought a clarification from the Advance ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in White Oats Tax Exemption Case — Commodity Held Exempt Under Entry 16 of KVAT Act, 2003. White Oats Classified as 'Cereals' and 'Food Grains' Entitled to Exemption Despite Processing.

15 Apr 2015

The case involves a batch of 48 revision petitions filed by M/s Pioneer Trading, a partnership firm represented by its partner Smt. Sheela Venkatesh, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Inordinate Delay in Granting Permission to Change Land Use from Railway Reservation to Amenities Under DC Regulations. Held that the Corporation's failure to decide the application within a reasonable time amounts to arbitrary exercise of power and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

13 Mar 2014

The petitioners, Wadhwa Residency Private Limited and Mr. Manohar M. Chhabria, owned a large plot of land in Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was designated as...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Commissioner's Clarification for Lack of Jurisdiction — Commissioner Cannot Invalidate Section 60 Advance Ruling Without Invoking Revisional or Appellate Powers Under KVAT Act.

12 Mar 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Gras Impex Pvt. Ltd., a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act), sought a clarification under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Premium on Staircase and Lift Areas Under D.C. Regulations — Levy at Revised Land Rate Upheld. The court held that the Municipal Corporation can charge premium for exempted FSI areas at the prevailing land rate, and the petitioners have no vested right to the earlier rate.

10 Jun 2010

The petitioners, M/s. Buildarch and its partner, owned a property at Prabhadevi, Mumbai, and sought to redevelop it. They submitted plans and paid var...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Clarification Denying Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Benefit to Warehoused Raw Materials. Customs Authorities' Orders Declining KVSS Benefit for Imported Raw Materials Stored in Bonded Warehouse Upheld as Per Ministry Clarification.

15 Sep 2005

The petitioners, ex-partners of M/s. Zuari Stainless Steel Industries, a 100% export-oriented unit, imported raw materials (steel sheets in coils) whi...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)