Search Results for "Cicily Kallarackal"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Armed Forces Tribunal Orders Under Article 226. High Court reversed Tribunal orders and granted relief; statutory appeal mechanism under Sections 30 and 31 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 argued to exclude writ jurisdiction.

In these connected civil appeals, the Supreme Court was confronted with the issue of maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Consumer Protection Act Penalty Case for Violation of Summary Trial Procedure. Failure to Record Plea and Conduct Trial as Per Sections 254 and 262 CrPC Renders Proceedings Void.

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, was convicted by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (State Commission) under Section 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Developer in Consumer Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance of Refund Order. Held that Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is penal in nature and bail should be granted liberally unless there is likelihood of abscondence or tampering with evidence.

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, a developer, was involved in a consumer dispute with the respondent, Dhanraj Tulshiram Khaparde, who had paid Rs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GCZMA Demolition Order for Lack of Quorum and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's 18 rooms saved as sub-committee meeting with only 4 members violated requirement of 5 members for cases directed by High Court.

The petitioner, Shri Sylvestre D'Souza, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15/02...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Consumer Appeal Dismissed in Default by State Commission. Held that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 does not bar restoration of appeals dismissed for non-prosecution and the State Commission has inherent power to restore such appeals.

The petitioner, Anita Chandrakant Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 5.9.2014 passed by the Maharash...