Search Results for "Charas"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Charas"

70 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Possession of Commercial Quantity of Charas — Rejects Argument That Quantity Must Be Weighed After Excluding Packing Material. The court held that the weight of the contraband substance for determining commercial quantity under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act is the weight of the substance itself, and the prosecution is not required to exclude packing material.

12 Aug 2011

The appellant, Nandlal Shyamdas, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS Court, Mapusa, for an offence under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application in NDPS Case Involving 1.100 kg Charas — Section 50 Compliance Not Required When Accused Declines Search Before Magistrate/Gazetted Officer. Accused not entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. as charge-sheet filed within 180 days for commercial quantity.

12 Aug 2011

The applicant, Fakir Ahmed Mohd. Shaikh, was arrested and allegedly found in possession of 1.100 kg of charas, a commercial quantity under the NDPS Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act, 1985. Secret Information Not Forwarded to Superior Officer, Search Vitiated.

3 May 2018

The appellant, Kallumal Jaidmal Kukareja @ Kallumama, was convicted by the NDPS Special Judge, Greater Bombay, for an offence punishable under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

25 Apr 2014

The appellant, Vijay Dhanbahadur Thapa, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mapusa, in Special Criminal Case No. 12/2008 for an offence punishable und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case but Reduces Sentence — Recovery of 13 Kg Charas from Dhaba Counter. Conscious possession established as appellant was managing the dhaba and contraband found below counter; sentence reduced from 15 to 10 years considering age and first offence.

15 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Jeet Ram against his conviction under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Possession of Charas — Conscious Possession Established. The court held that the presumption of conscious possession under Sections 54 and 35 of the NDPS Act was not rebutted by the appellant, who failed to prove that the contraband belonged to another person.

6 Jul 2005

The appellant, Mohammed Aslam, was convicted by the Special Judge, Goa, in Special Criminal Case No. 35/2001 for an offence under Section 20(b)(ii) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Accused in NDPS Case for Possession of 2.28 kg Charas — Compliance with Section 50 NDPS Act Not Required for Baggage Search. The court held that the search of the handbag and room did not require compliance with Section 50, and the personal search was valid as the accused was given the option to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.

27 Oct 2005

The appellant, Ritesh Kumar, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS Court, Mapusa, under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 57 — Failure to Inform Immediate Superior Officer Renders Search and Seizure Illegal. The court held that strict compliance with Section 57 of the NDPS Act, 1985 is mandatory and non-compliance vitiates the conviction.

24 Aug 2005

The appellant, Ruffus Leo Manuel, was convicted by the NDPS Court at Mapusa under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...

High Court

Bombay High Court (Goa Bench) Upholds Conviction of Accused in NDPS Case for Possession of 1.15 kg Charas — Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act Not Required as Recovery Was from Bag, Not Person.

3 Feb 2005

The appellant, Mohammad Asraf Koloo, was convicted by the Special Judge, Goa, under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case: Reversal of Acquittal by High Court Sustained. Commercial Quantity of Charas Recovered from Appellants; Complainant as Investigating Officer Not Per Se Biased.

11 Dec 2020

The case pertains to the conviction of Rajesh Dhiman and Gulshan Rana under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (ND...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)