Search Results for "Champsey Bhara test"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Champsey Bhara test"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

1 Apr 2015

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

4 Feb 2015

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Dispute Over Supply of Pulverised Fly Ash from Thermal Power Plant. The petitions, filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek to set aside the award that rejected claims for specific performance and damages arising from an agreement dated 4 October 2000.

24 Jul 2014

The dispute arose from a long-term agreement dated 4 October 2000 between Dirk India Private Limited (Dirk India) and Maharashtra State Electricity Ge...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Employer in Arbitration Award Dispute — Award Upheld as No Error of Law Apparent on Face. Arbitrator's Award Not Set Aside Despite Limitation Defense Under Section 326 of U.P. Act 2 of 1916; No Legal Proposition Formed Basis of Award.

20 Aug 1969

The dispute arose from a construction contract for pumping stations and reservoirs at Kanpur between the appellant, Kanpur Nagar Mahapalika (formerly ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court's Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dispute Involves Interpretation of Contractual Notice Requirement as Condition Precedent and Applicability of Waiver and Estoppel in EPC Contract.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from multiple Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) agreements between SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation (con...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)