Search Results for "Cannabis"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Cannabis"

62 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 62 result(s)

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Insufficient Evidence Linking Him to Cannabis Cultivation. Prosecution Failed to Prove Beyond Reasonable Doubt That Accused Was Cultivator Where Land Had Multiple Occupiers and Investigation Did Not Verify Specific Cultivation, Under Section 20(a)(i) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

7 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 20(a)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, where the appellant was sentenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42. Failure to Record Information and Forward Report to Superior Officer Renders Search Illegal.

4 Sep 2017

The appellant, Dnyandeo s/o Atmaram Aswar, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, in Sessions Trial No. 8/2002 for an offenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application in NDPS Case Involving 1.100 kg Charas — Section 50 Compliance Not Required When Accused Declines Search Before Magistrate/Gazetted Officer. Accused not entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. as charge-sheet filed within 180 days for commercial quantity.

12 Aug 2011

The applicant, Fakir Ahmed Mohd. Shaikh, was arrested and allegedly found in possession of 1.100 kg of charas, a commercial quantity under the NDPS Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 20 read with Section 29 of NDPS Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper procedure and evidence of conscious possession was insufficient.

5 Jul 2018

The appellants, Baldeosingh s/o Jagannathsingh Sengar and Ishwarsingh s/o Dakursingh Gaur, were convicted by the Special Court under NDPS Act, Nagpur ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Possession of Commercial Quantity of Charas — Rejects Argument That Quantity Must Be Weighed After Excluding Packing Material. The court held that the weight of the contraband substance for determining commercial quantity under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act is the weight of the substance itself, and the prosecution is not required to exclude packing material.

12 Aug 2011

The appellant, Nandlal Shyamdas, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS Court, Mapusa, for an offence under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Search and Seizure Procedures. Failure to Join Independent Witnesses and Non-Production of Seized Contraband Before Court Renders Conviction Unsustainable Under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act, 1985.

15 Dec 2021

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Mustaq Ahamed alias Maamu and Siraj Basha alias Siraj alias Gunda against the judgment of conviction a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Complainant in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42. Search Conducted Without Recording Information and Without Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Held Illegal, Acquittal Upheld.

17 Jan 2005

The appeal was filed by the original complainant, an Assistant Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Pune, challenging the judgment and order dated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in NDPS Act Case, Modifying Sentence on Double Punishment Grounds. Separate sentences for offences under Sections 20 and 25/29 from same transaction held impermissible, and fine cannot be cumulative when sentences run concurrently under Section 53 IPC.

8 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The appellant and a co-accused were intercepted dur...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NDPS Proceedings Against Petitioner for Lack of Evidence of Conscious Possession and Commercial Quantity. Court holds that mere presence in a vehicle with contraband does not constitute possession under Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of NDPS Act without proof of knowledge and control.

27 May 2024

The petitioner, Mr. Kalam Narendra, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act. The court held that failure to inform the accused of his right to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer under Section 50 of the NDPS Act vitiates the seizure and entitles the accused to bail.

26 Aug 2022

The petitioner, Roshan Kumar Mishra, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking regular bail i...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)