Search Results for "CPC applicability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "CPC applicability"

747 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 747 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition; Holds Common Election Petition Maintainable Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Rejection of Nominations of School Teachers for Not Obtaining Management Permission Held Illegal Following Supreme Court Precedent.

7 Jul 2011

The dispute arose from elections to Gram Panchayat Nawargaon, Taluq Sindewahi, District Chandrapur, held on 22 August 2010. The Gram Panchayat consist...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of CPC Application in Eviction Appeal Under Karnataka Public Premises Act. CPC Provisions Not Applicable to Summary Proceedings Under Section 10 of the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1974.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, T.V. Sathyanarayana Gupta, was an alleged unauthorized occupant of a shop in a municipal complex in Pavagada Town, Tumakuru District. ...

High Court

High Court Holds in Review Petition that CPC Amendments under Commercial Courts Act Do Not Apply to Commercial Disputes Below Specified Value. The 120‑day limit for written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is inapplicable to suits where the Specified Value is below Rs. 3 lakhs, even if the suit is before the Commercial Division under the proviso to Section 7.

1 Jun 2019

The dispute arose in a commercial suit where the Plaintiff had determined the Specified Value at Rs. 20,000, which was below the threshold of Rs. 3 la...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Applicability of Order XXXVII CPC to Summary Suits Filed Before Civil Judge (Senior Division). The court held that Order XXXVII CPC applies to all courts specified in Rule 1, including Civil Judge (Senior Division), and Circular ROC No.2526/1959 is not applicable.

29 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Sri. Ashok P Shah, the defendant in O.S. No. 16/2014 pending before the Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Chitradurga, filed a writ pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.

14 Sep 2017

The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Special Court to Consider Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application in KPIDFE Act Proceedings — Rejection of Application as Not Maintainable Set Aside. The Special Court under KPIDFE Act must adjudicate maintainability applications under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on merits, as CPC applies to its proceedings.

8 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Smt. Vanitha S., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at B...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Commercial Appeal by Appellant Against Order Rejecting Return of Plaint Application -- Maintainability Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and CPC -- Jurisdiction Dispute in Commercial Suit

29 Jan 2026

The High Court dismissed a commercial appeal filed against an order rejecting an application under Order VII Rule 10 of CPC seeking return of plaint o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in CPC Case — Application Under Order IX Rule 13 Not Maintainable After Appeal Against Ex Parte Decree Is Disposed of on Merits. Explanation to Order IX Rule 13 of CPC bars a second application to set aside ex parte decree when an appeal against it has been heard and disposed of on merits.

2 Feb 2016

The appellant, Anjanappa, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

24 Aug 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Defendant’s Civil Revision Petition Challenging Refusal to File Additional Written Statement in Commercial Suit. Court Rules that Order VIII Rule 9 CPC Application is Not Maintainable Under Commercial Courts Act Due to Strict Timelines and Availability of Inspection Safeguards Under Order XI CPC.

17 Jul 2026

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the petitioner/defendant in the Principal Commercial Court, Egmore,...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)