Search Results for "Brokerage"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Brokerage"

77 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 77 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitrator's findings of fact and declined to re-appreciate evidence, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Sharekhan Limited, a stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Share Broker Bad Debt Case — Affirms Deduction Under Section 36(1)(vii) of Income Tax Act. Amounts Advanced for Client Transactions Constitute Business Debts Allowable as Bad Debts Even if Only Commission Was Credited to Profit and Loss Account.

28 Feb 2012

The appeal by the Revenue arose from a decision of the Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 16 July 2010. The assessee, Shri Shrey...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

21 Apr 2026

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sub-Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Appellate Bench Decision of Bombay Stock Exchange. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitral tribunal and appellate bench are not liable to be interfered with under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

9 Oct 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Actal, a sole proprietorship concern engaged in trading in shares, insurance, bonds, mutual funds, etc., was associated with the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Decides Tax Deduction at Source Liability for Cellular Mobile Service Providers Under Income Tax Act, 1961 - The Court clarified that obligation under Section 194-H requires principal-agent relationship between payer and payee as per Section 182 of Contract Act, 1872, and payments must be for services in buying/selling goods or asset transactions, not being securities.

28 Feb 2024

The Supreme Court delivered a common judgment addressing appeals by the Revenue and assessees, who were cellular mobile telephone service providers, c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Indemnity Under Stock Exchange Bye-Law 218(d). The court held that the appellate tribunal's award was reasoned and not contrary to the Contract Act, and that TDS certificates do not constitute acknowledgment of liability.

30 Jul 2013

The case involves an appeal against the dismissal of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escapement — Section 148 Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessments based on mere change of opinion without tangible material is invalid.

21 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Amar Hotchand Nagpal, a finance and estate broker, challenged three notices dated 23rd September 1997 issued under Section 148 of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Securities Appellate Tribunal's Remand Order in Insurance Brokerage Dispute. Appellate Tribunal Erred in Directing Fresh Inquiry When Insurance Regulator Found Insufficient Evidence of Bribery Under Section 41(1) of Insurance Act, 1938 and Clause 37(1) of IRDA (Insurance Brokers) Regulations, 2013.

24 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by an insurance and reinsurance brokerage firm challenging an order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal that had se...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Part Regarding Computation of Deduction Under Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Receipts from Hire of Barges, Proceeds of Services, Repairs of Vessels, and Extraction Charges Held Part of Total Turnover for Export Deduction.

7 May 2015

The appellant, Sesa Goa Ltd., is a company engaged in the business of mining and export of iron ore. For the assessment year 1996-1997, the appellant ...

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.

31 Jan 2019

The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)