Search Results for "Bombay Motor Vehicles Rules"

252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Reduces Compensation by 50% in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Driver. Deceased's failure to place warning signs after tyre puncture on highway contributed to accident, leading to apportionment of liability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Sunil Samharu Yadav, who died in a road accident on 19.05.2013. The deceased w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Temporary Authorisation and NOC for Vehicles with Cancelled Fitness Certificates. Authorities Directed to Accept Tax Dues and Issue No Objection Certificate Under Section 48 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Geekom Logistech Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in transport business, owned a fleet of vehicl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeals by Transport Authorities Against State Tourism Corporation's Tax Exemption Claim. Tourist Vehicles of Andhra Pradesh State Tourism Corporation Not Exempt from Tax Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 Despite Notification Dated 22.03.1994.

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by the Assistant Regional Transport Officer and the Deputy Commissioner for Transports against an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for Compliance with Procedural Rules. Court Holds That Insistence on Personal Appearance of Claimants at Filing Is Not Mandatory Under Rule 254(2) of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Anil Prabhakar Tadkalkar, a practicing advocate, raising several issues concerning the disposal of claim ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Working Hours Provisions in Motor Transport Workers Act. Court upholds sections 13 and 16 of Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 as constitutionally valid and not violative of Articles 14 and 21.

The petitioner, BEST Worker's Union, claiming to be an approved and representative union for employees in the transport section of Brihanmumbai Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes RTA Resolution Mandating 1300 cc Engine for Contract Carriage Permits — Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Regional Transport Authority Cannot Impose Conditions Beyond Those Specified in Section 74 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Mumbai Pune Taxi Owners Association, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, comprising taxi owners operating...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order in Entry Tax Case — Chassis Entry Tax Levy Set Aside as Chassis Not 'Goods' Under Entry Tax Act After Integration into Bus Body.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax and the Entry Tax Officer, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and o...