Search Results for "Bombay Money Lenders Act"

85 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Arbitration Petition and Winding Up Petition Against Corporate Debtor — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief or Insolvency as CDR Scheme Was Under Consideration and Debt Was Not Clearly Due.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd., a non-banking financial company, granted a term loan of Rs. 50 crores to the first respondent, U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions Against GOL Offshore Ltd. Due to Bona Fide Dispute and Absence of Commercial Insolvency. Debt Not Due and Payable Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns two winding up petitions filed by Export-Import Bank of India and Punjab National Bank (International) Ltd. against GOL Offshore...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Varun Global Limited for Non-Payment of Loan Debt. Life Insurance Corporation of India Succeeds in Proving Company's Inability to Pay Debts Under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petitions for Non-Prosecution Due to Non-Compliance with Directions. Failure to File Affidavit of Documents and Appear Before Court Leads to Dismissal Under Rule 34 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.

The judgment concerns two company petitions (CP 496/2014 and CP 497/2014) filed by Janak Herkishen Vaswani and Mrs. Renuka Herkishen Vaswani respectiv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Definition of Loan Under Maharashtra Money-Lending Act. Classification Between Interest-Free Advances and Loans at Interest Held Not Arbitrary Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Fauzan Shaikh, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of clauses (j) ...