Search Results for "Beer bar"

54 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Appellants in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Section 489B r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession or use of counterfeit currency notes.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Prabhakar Patlola and Venkatesh Chanda under Section 489B read with Section 34 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Involving Beer Labels. Plaintiff's mark 'HAYWARDS 5000' held to be infringed by defendant's use of '5000' in similar label, as numeral is an essential feature not descriptive of beer strength.

The plaintiff, Skol Breweries Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Som Distilleries & Breweries Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree for Landlord's Bonafide Requirement to Run Beer Bar — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Article 227. Landlord's experience in liquor business and financial capacity established bonafide need for suit premises under Rent Control Act.

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute where the landlord, Dilip Gyanchand Khemani, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 17 of 2006 for eviction of the t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Infringement of Registered Trade Mark SABMiller India in Beer Bottles. The Court held that use of an identical registered trade mark on identical goods constitutes infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and granted interim injunction.

The Respondent, SABMiller India Ltd., held a registered trade mark 'SABMiller India / SABMILLER INDIA' in classes 21 and 32 under the Trade Marks Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused for Attempt to Murder Under Section 307 IPC — Injured Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence Found Credible. Common Intention Established Under Section 34 IPC as Accused Attacked Victim Simultaneously with Sharp Weapons.

The judgment concerns three criminal appeals filed by accused persons convicted under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of 7½-Year-Old Mentally Challenged Girl. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery, and Medical Reports Established Guilt Beyond Doubt; Aggravating Factors Outweighed Mitigating Factors.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Manoj Pratap Singh, upholding his conviction and death sentence for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused No.2 in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Common Intention. Accused Allegedly Assaulted Deceased with Beer Bottle but Court Found No Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC.

The petitioner, Appu @ Ashoka, accused No.2, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Identification of Victim and Accused.

The case involves three appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) against their conviction and ...