Search Results for "Banking Ombudsman Scheme"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Banking Ombudsman Order in Demand Draft Cancellation Dispute. Petitioner Entitled to Cancellation of DD and Credit of Amount with Interest as RBI Circulars Permit Cancellation After Three Months and Complaint Was Within Limitation.

The petitioner, Doddaballapur Spinning Mills, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, held a current account with ICICI Bank Ltd. (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Banking Ombudsman Order in Demand Draft Cancellation Dispute. Petitioner Entitled to Cancellation of DD and Credit of Amount with Interest as Per RBI Circulars.

The petitioner, Doddaballapur Spinning Mills, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, held a current account with ICICI Bank Ltd. (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Orders Bank to Refund Rs. 76.9 Lakhs in Unauthorized Transaction Case. Judgment Reinforces Zero Liability for Customers Reporting Unauthorized Transactions Promptly

In a case involving unauthorized electronic banking transactions, the court ruled that the bank (Respondent No. 2) must refund Rs. 76,90,017/- to Phar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Banking Ombudsman Dispute Over Counterfeit Drafts. Limitation Act Does Not Apply to Proceedings Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2002.

The petitioner, Bank of Baroda, challenged an arbitral award passed by the Banking Ombudsman (respondent no.2) in favor of respondent no.1, Vijaya Ban...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bank Deficiency Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs 1 Lakh to Rs 30 Lakh for Unauthorized Online Transfer. Bank's Gross Negligence in Linking School Accounts Without Request Leads to Full Liability Despite Alleged Principal Complicity.

The case involves a complaint by DAV Public School against Indian Bank for deficiency in service. The school maintained three accounts with the bank, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Bank Forfeiture — Directs Refund of Rs.24.10 Lakhs Deposit with Interest. Forfeiture of deposit without contractual authority in auction sale is arbitrary and unjust, warranting refund with interest at 6% per annum.

The petitioner, P Balaji Babu, participated in an auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent No.1) for the sale of immovable property ow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...