Search Results for "Bank officers"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High standards of honesty and proportionality in disciplinary actions reaffirmed by the Supreme Court.

  Principles of Natural Justice: Breach of natural justice alone is insufficient for setting aside disciplinary action if the misconduct is proven...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Fraudulent Activities of Bank Officers and Private Businessmen Exposed : Unveiling the Deceptive Practices and Misuse of Bank Accounts

The Supreme Court dismissed two special leave petitions (SLPs) in the case of fraudulent transactions involving bank officials and private businessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Bank's Disciplinary Action Against Employee for Negligence in Cash Handling. High Court's Interference with Departmental Inquiry Findings Set Aside as Judicial Review Limited to Procedural Fairness and Perversity Under UCO Bank Regulations.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal challenging the High Court's decision that quashed disciplinary proceedings against a bank employee. The respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Money Suit Recovery Case — High Court Order for Refund of Anticipatory Bail Amount Set Aside. Full and Final Settlement Not Proved by Oral Evidence Alone When Banking Transactions Admitted.

The appellant, Anita Rani, filed two money suits against the respondents for recovery of amounts allegedly lent or misappropriated. The first suit sou...