Search Results for "BSE Byelaws"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Rejection of Counterclaim on Limitation Grounds. Court holds that limitation for counterclaim in arbitration under BSE Byelaws runs from date of filing of claim, not from accrual of cause of action.

The Petitioner, Hansraj Sohanlal Gouthi, HUF, through its Karta Ravi Gouthi, challenged an arbitral award dated 13 July 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition by City Civil Court, Holding City Civil Court is Not a 'Court' Under Section 2(1)(e) of Arbitration Act. The Court set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration by the proper court.

The appellant, a share broker, purchased 100 shares of Odyssey Technology Limited on behalf of a client. The shares were sent for registration but onl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds in Light of SEBI Circulars Extending Limitation Period from Six Months to Three Years. The court remitted the matter to the Arbitral Tribunal for reconsideration of limitation under the extended period.

The petitioner, India Infoline Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute for Lack of Reasons and Non-Consideration of Margin Requirements. Award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 set aside as Arbitrator failed to consider deposit and margin obligations of client.

The Petitioner, Anand Rathi Share and Stock Brokers Ltd., a share and stock broker and member of NSE, challenged an arbitral award dated 15 October 20...