Search Results for "Assam Accord"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Resolves Conflict in Citizenship Rules for Assam NRC: Harmonious Construction of Sub-para (2) of Paragraph 3 and Paragraph 8 of Schedule to Citizenship Rules, 2003. Court Declines to Create Appellate Forum Under Article 142, Leaves it to Parliament and Executive.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging the preparation of the National Register of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overturns Tribunal Ruling, Declares Assam Resident Indian Citizen. Procedural Unfairness and Insufficient Evidence Lead to Landmark Judgment Ensuring Justice and Upholding Natural Rights

Md. Rahim Ali, declared a foreigner by the Foreigners Tribunal in Nalbari, Assam. Rahim Ali challenged this decision, presenting various pieces of evi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 for Migrants to Assam Assam Accord-related citizenship provision sustained, balancing Article 14, Article 29, and legislative competence under Article 11.

1. Background and Assam Accord The petitioners challenged Section 6A, introduced by the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 1985, which grants citizenship ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Directs Completion of Investigation in Harassment Case Involving Medical Officer. No Sanction Required for Offenses Under Section 509 IPC and Atrocities Act; Final Report to Exclude Section 506 IPC

The petitioner, a Medical Officer Class – I, alleged harassment by her colleagues and superiors, leading to the filing of an FIR under IPC Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Their Involvement in Company's Business.

The petitioners, including a company and its directors, challenged the order issuing process under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Detenu's Exoneration in Adjudication Proceedings Not Considered by Detaining Authority, Rendering Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Bherchand Tikaji Bora, challenged an order of detention dated 27th August 1998 passed under Section 3(1) of the ...