Search Results for "Article 36(b)"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Show Cause Notice in Encroachment Case — No Writ Lies Against Show Cause Notice Without Established Legal Right. Petitioner Failed to Establish Legal Right to Challenge Notice Under Section 128(1)(b) of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

The petitioner, D. Manoharan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a notice d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Encroachment Notice Under TNULB Act — Show Cause Notice Not Entertainable Under Article 226. Petitioner Failed to Establish Legal Right; Authorities Directed to Follow Procedure Under Section 128 Before Removal.

The petitioner, Thirumalai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 19.01.2026 issued by the 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Transfer of Complaint Against Advocate for Bogus Law Degree to Bar Council of India. Mandamus Issued Under Section 36B of Advocates Act, 1961 for Failure of State Bar Council to Dispose Complaint Within One Year.

The petitioner, a practicing advocate from Salem, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to direct th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit Based on Registered Sale Deed — Title Not Extinguished by Subsequent Mutation or Revenue Entries. Registered sale deed confers absolute title and possession; subsequent revenue entries or mutation do not affect title unless set aside by competent court.

The appeal arises from a suit for possession filed by the plaintiff-appellant (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Department's Notice on Private Forest Land. Held that lands restored under Section 22A of Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 retain status of reserved forest under Indian Forest Act, 1927.

The Petitioner, Sinhagad Technical Education Society, claimed ownership of lands bearing Gat Nos. 310 and 311 at village Kusgaon Budruk, Taluka Maval,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...