Search Results for "Article 226(2)"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Refused Permission to Abandon Part of Declaration Claim at the Appellate Stage. 

Order XXIII Rule 1(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Right to Withdraw Suit or Abandon Part of Claim – Appellate Stage – Effect of Trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Set Aside High Court’s Order Directing Compassionate Appointment – Lump Sum Ex-Gratia Granted Under Article 142. Compassionate Appointment – Financial Condition Consideration – High Court Erred in Overlooking Suitability Criterion – Article 142 Invoked for Equitable Relief

Acts And Sections Discussed Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 142 – Extraordinary Power Exercised for Equitable Relief – Para 49 Civil P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator's Award in Contract Dispute Over Final Bill Claims. Court Held That Arbitrator's Consideration of Vitiating Factors and Contract Clauses Was Permissible Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Despite Prohibition on Further Claims in Clauses 65 and 65A.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 02.07.2001 for repair works, with time extended to 19.01.2002. The respondent contractor submitted a final bil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Ganpat Shingade. The appellants, including his wife Jyoti, were convicted under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Award in Favor of Petitioner in Arbitration Dispute. Court Holds That Award Does Not Violate Public Policy and Condoned Delay of 273 Days Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse S.A., a Swiss company, entered into a contract with the respondent, Sakuma Exports Limited, an I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Stent Manufacturer from Tender Process. Petitioner's Drug Eluting Stents, Approved by DCGI, Held Eligible for Supply Under Rajiv Gandhi Arogya Yojana.

The Petitioner, M/s. Vascular Concepts Ltd., a company manufacturing Drug Eluting Stents, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Old Incidents Without Proximate Link to Public Order.

The petitioner, Adil Chaus, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad, on 30 August 2011 under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reassessment Notices for Non-Disclosure of Reasons. Failure to Supply Recorded Reasons Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Violates Natural Justice and Renders Reopening Invalid.

The petitioner, Ajay Oxycholoride Floorings, a partnership firm, challenged two notices dated 20th February 1990 and 3rd June 1991 issued by the Assis...