Search Results for "Army Rules"

3 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Order Invalidating General Court Martial Proceedings Due to Improper Appointment of Judge Advocate. A Court Martial’s proceedings were declared invalid due to the improper appointment of a junior officer as Judge Advocate, contrary to legal requirements.

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, which set aside the Armed Forces Tribunal's decision to uphold the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Sentence Modification in Court-Martial Case. General Court Martial Composition Violated Army Rules, 1954, Rule 40(2) and Rule 102, but Armed Forces Tribunal's Sentencing Discretion Under Section 71(e) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Upheld.

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a retired Lieutenant General of the Indian Army, initiated after an anonymous complaint in 200...