Search Results for "Amusement Park"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Amusement Park"

18 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Directs Authorities to Decide License Renewal Application for Water Park Within Two Weeks. Writ of Mandamus Issued for Consideration of Renewal Application Under Articles 14, 19, and 226 of the Constitution of India.

12 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Gujarat Amusement and Funworld Pvt. Ltd., filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 14, 19, and 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on Award Function with Intermittent Performances. Sponsorship Amount for Invitee-Only Event Constitutes Payment for Admission Under Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act.

20 Jun 2024

The petitioner, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organized the 'APSARA' award function on 21st January 2006 at Jams...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

17 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Order to Vacate Premises — Failure to File Undertaking and Pay Dues Not Contempt as Substantive Compliance Achieved.

6 May 2020

The contempt petition was filed by Hukum Chand Deswal (petitioner) against Satish Raj Deswal (respondent) alleging wilful disobedience of the Supreme ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Amusement Park Duty Dispute — Concessional Rate Under Section 3(5)(a) of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 Not Further Reducible by Section 3(2). The court held that a general admission ticket to an amusement park does not qualify as a lump sum payment for a series of entertainments under Section 3(2), so the duty for the fourth and fifth years is 7.5%.

18 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute concerned the rate ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Five Workmen as Protected Workmen — Trade Union Must Be Registered Under Trade Unions Act, 1926 to Claim Protection Under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that an unregistered trade union cannot seek declaration of its office bearers as protected workmen under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Nov 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Wonderla Holidays Limited, a public limited company running amusement parks, challenged an order dated 16.09.2017 passed by the A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Composition Tax Application Under KVAT Act. Rule 135(4) of KVAT Rules, 2005 restricting composition scheme for dealers selling liquor held ultra vires Section 15 of KVAT Act, 2003.

7 Nov 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Wonderla Holidays Limited, operates a composite business including an amusement park, a 3-star hotel, and a restaurant. It applie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Video Game Parlour Licence Despite Parking Concerns, Emphasizes Reasonable Exercise of Police Powers Under Bombay Police Act, 1951. Commissioner's Refusal Based on Mere Apprehension Without Specific Evidence Held Arbitrary.

28 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Jagdish N. Shetty, sole proprietor of M/s. Om Sai Video Game Parlour, applied for a licence under the Bombay Police Act, 1951 to opera...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council Against Levy of Entertainment Duty on Business Exhibitions. Business-to-business trade shows with restricted entry are not 'entertainment' under Section 2(5) of the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, and no duty is leviable under Sections 3 and 4(2).

4 Mar 2013

The Petitioner, The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organizes annual b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

19 Dec 2006

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)