Search Results for "AirTel"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "AirTel"

114 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Taxability of Capital Gains from Transfer of Shares of a Cayman Islands Company Holding Indian Telecom Assets. The core issue involves whether the offshore transaction is liable to capital gains tax in India under the Income Tax Act, 1961, given that the company's value is derived from Indian telecom assets.

1 Aug 2026

The matter concerned a tax dispute between Vodafone International Holdings BV (VIH), a Netherlands resident company, and the Indian Revenue authoritie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes One-Time Spectrum Charge on Cellular Operators for Spectrum Beyond 6.2 MHz, Holding No Statutory Power Under Telegraph Act, 1885 to Impose Retrospective Charges

8 Jun 2026

The case involved a writ petition filed by major cellular mobile service operators, Bharti Airtel Limited and Vodafone Idea Limited, challenging the i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Set-Off Claim in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court held that set-off is permissible during CIRP as it promotes efficiency and equity, and the moratorium under Section 14 does not automatically prohibit such adjustments when claims arise from mutual and connected transactions.

3 Jan 2024

The appeal before the Supreme Court involved a dispute between Bharti Airtel Limited and Bharti Hexacom Limited (Airtel entities) and Aircel Limited a...

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bharti Airtel Officials in Private Complaint for Lack of Vicarious Liability and Abuse of Process. The court held that continuing proceedings against directors and officers without specific allegations of their involvement would be an abuse of process under Section 482 CrPC.

11 Dec 2019

The petitioners, who are the Chairman, Managing Director, CEO, and Nodal Officer of Bharti Airtel Ltd., filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Discharge Petition in Excise Duty Evasion Case — No Prima Facie Case for Discharge Established. Petitioner, a German national and director of a distillery, failed to show that the allegations under IPC and PC Act were groundless, as the charge sheet and material disclosed sufficient grounds to proceed.

19 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Rakesh Rastogi, a German national and director of M/s. Krimpy Distillery, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bharti Airtel's Challenge to Tender for Bandwidth Services — Eligibility Condition Requiring Government Experience Upheld. Court Holds That Tender Conditions Are Not Open to Judicial Review Unless Arbitrary or Mala Fide, and the Condition Was Rationally Connected to the Object of the Tender Under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

19 Aug 2019

The petitioners, Bharti Airtel Limited and its officer, challenged a tender issued by Maharashtra Information Technology Corporation Limited (MahaIT) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints Against Bharti Airtel for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC — Public Servant Protection Extended to Employees of Municipal Corporation Acting in Discharge of Official Duty. Employees of Municipal Corporation are public servants under Section 21 IPC, and acts of removing unauthorized telephone cables are in discharge of official duty, requiring sanction under Section 197 CrPC before prosecution.

22 Sep 2015

The applicant, Bharti Airtel Limited, filed three criminal applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

10 Sep 2015

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction Application in 'AirTel' Trademark Dispute Between Telecom and Liquor Companies. Plaintiffs Allege Passing Off and Copyright Infringement Against Defendants Using Identical Mark on Alcoholic Beverages.

21 Mar 2006

The plaintiffs, a leading telecommunications company providing mobile services under the brand 'AirTel', filed a suit against the defendants, a liquor...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)