Search Results for "Aero India Show"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Aero India Show"

11 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Alleging Smuggling of Sensitive Materials During Aero India Shows for Lack of Credible Material and Public Interest. The Court held that a Public Interest Litigation must be based on bonafide intentions and concrete evidence, not on vague allegations or newspaper reports, and dismissed the petition as an abuse of process.

31 Jul 2018

The petitioners, Nishchal Padhya and Arun Goyal, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Hi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking Records of Import of Ground Handling Equipment During Aero India Shows. Petitioners failed to establish any specific instance of smuggling or violation of law, and the petition was found to be based on vague allegations and unsubstantiated claims.

31 Jul 2018

The petitioners, Nishchal Padhya and Arun Goyal, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Airport Authority's Demand for Vacant Possession of Premises. Lease Agreement for Flying Club Premises at Juhu Aerodrome Terminated Due to Non-Payment of Rent and Unauthorized Subletting.

24 Jan 2018

The petitioners, M/s. Bombay Flying Club and its Honorary Secretary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Appellate Authority's Order Allowing Landlord's Application Under Section 32(4) of Goa Rent Act for Non-Payment of Rent — Tenant's Justification of Family Litigation Rejected as Insufficient Cause. The court held that the tenant's default in depositing rent for over 9 years during the appeal warranted the drastic remedy of stopping proceedings and directing possession under Section 32(4) of the Goa, Daman & Diu (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.

21 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Kanchan Ramdas Moraskar, was a tenant of premises owned by the respondent, Dr. Armando Joao Benedito Mascarenhas (since deceased,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts. Creditor's Statutory Demand for USD 3 Million Remained Unpaid, Leading to Order for Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as petitioner Aerotron Limited did not prove service of demand notice under Section 434.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the company was commercially insolvent and unable to pay its debts, and appointed the Official Liquidator to take charge of its assets.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows BEML's Appeal in Canteen Workers' Regularisation Dispute — Contract Labour Not Absorbed Despite Canteen Being Statutory Obligation. The court held that without a notification under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, contract labour cannot be deemed employees of the principal employer, and the Labour Court exceeded its jurisdiction by directing absorption.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 16.04.2010 passed by a Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition No. 3...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows BEML's Appeal in Canteen Workers' Regularisation Dispute — Contract Labour Not Absorbed Despite Canteen Being Statutory Obligation. The court held that the workmen in a statutory canteen run by a contractor are not entitled to regularisation as employees of the principal employer under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 16.04.2010 in Writ Petition No. 35453/2003. The appellant in WA No. 1980/2010 is BEML ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute Regarding Canteen Workers' Status as Workmen of Principal Employer. Canteen workers employed through contractor held to be workmen of BEML Limited under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 due to statutory obligation to provide canteen.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals filed by BEML Limited (formerly Bharat Earth Movers Ltd.) and the President of Mysore Division General Labour Associatio...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)