Search Results for "AAIFR"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Asset Managers in Commercial Paper Recovery Suit Despite Pending SICA Appeal. The court held that Section 22 of SICA does not bar recovery suits where BIFR has declined registration, and the defendant failed to raise any triable issue.

The plaintiffs, Pramerica Asset Managers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed two summary suits against Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. for recovery of Rs. 25 c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Official Liquidator to Adjudicate Workmen's Claims in Winding Up of KMA Ltd. Under Sections 529A and 530 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the Official Liquidator must consider the Industrial Court's order dated 2 July 2005 in adjudicating claims of workmen.

The judgment concerns two company applications filed in the winding up proceedings of KMA Ltd. (in liquidation). Company Application No. 593 of 2011 w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Official Liquidator to Adjudicate Workmen's Claims in Winding Up of KMA Ltd. Under Sections 529A and 530 of Companies Act, 1956. Industrial Court's Order on Unpaid Wages Held Binding on Official Liquidator.

The judgment concerns two company applications filed in the winding up of KMA Ltd. (in liquidation). Company Application No.593 of 2011 was filed by a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...