Search Results for "2006 Rules"

5 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Deduction Rules for Compassionate Assistance in Motor Accident Compensation -- Appellants Appeals Against High Court Orders on Deduction of Haryana Government Scheme Benefits

The Supreme Court addressed appeals filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Limited challenging High Court orders regarding deduction of compassio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Compassionate Appointment Case — Appointments Under 2006 Rules Valid. Executive Instructions Cannot Supersede Statutory Rules Governing Compassionate Appointments.

The case involves an appeal by the State of Bihar against a judgment of the Patna High Court which directed that the respondents, Dilip Kumar and anot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Fee Regulatory Committee's Determination in Telangana Professional College Fee Dispute. Court Sets Aside High Court's Re-determination of Fees for B.E./B.Tech Courses for Block Period 2016-2019, Upholding Expert Committee's Uniform Fee of Rs.97,000 per Student.

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a dispute over the fixation of fee structure for B.E. and B.Tech courses in private unaided professi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Rajasthan State Sports Council in Promotion Dispute. Held that promotion criteria applicable as on date of consideration, not vacancy year, under Rule 9(4) of Rajasthan State Sports Council Service Rules, 2006.

The case involves a dispute over promotion to the post of Sports Officer in the Rajasthan State Sports Council. Respondent No. 1, Uma Dadhich, was app...