Search Results for "trademark dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "trademark dispute"

160 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trademark for Non-Use and Discrepancy in User Date — Ayyappan Brand Registration Expunged. The court held that failure to prove use of the mark as registered and unexplained discrepancy in user date warrant removal under Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s.Sree Lakshmi Balaji Industries, filed a petition under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, seeking removal/rect...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'HOTEL SPECIAL' vs 'SVT HOTEL SPECIAL' for Asafoetida. Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Addition of Prefix 'SVT'.

5 Apr 2024

The appellant/defendant, S.V.T Products, challenged an interim injunction order passed by the XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S. No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

1 Mar 2021

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Temporary Injunction Granted to Protect Registered Trademark 'Cothas' Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'Cotha'. Prior Registration and Use of 'Cothas' Since 1995 Establishes Prima Facie Case Under Sections 28 and 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

31 Jul 2017

The appellant, M/s. Cothas Coffee Co., a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents, M/s. Cotha Associ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'LIVE IN' Mark Found Deceptively Similar to 'LIVE-IN'. Phonetic and visual similarity between marks leads to injunction under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

2 Mar 2016

The Plaintiff, Federal Brands Ltd., filed a trademark infringement and passing off suit against Levi Strauss India Pvt. Ltd. seeking a temporary injun...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Trademark Infringement Case — Order Rejecting Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. The court held that the trial court erred in dismissing the application under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC for return of plaint, as the suit lacked cause of action within its territorial jurisdiction.

26 Jun 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Tata SIA Airlines Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cadila Pharmaceuticals in Passing Off Action by Medley Laboratories. Marks 'HB TONE' and 'RB TONE' Held Deceptively Similar for Pharmaceutical Products, Injunction Confirmed.

8 Apr 2011

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellant (original defendant) for infringement and passing o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for Lack of Evidence of Use and Passing Off. Marks VIVACITY and VIVZ held not deceptively similar to registered mark VIVA under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

12 Jul 2010

The Plaintiffs, Arviva Industries (India) Ltd., filed a suit seeking an injunction against the Defendants, Vikas M. Tulsian and others, alleging infri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving Lions Club International. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its territorial jurisdiction under Section 9A of CPC as amended for Maharashtra.

25 Jan 2006

The plaintiff, International Association of Lions Club, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving Lions Club International. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its territorial jurisdiction under Section 9A of CPC as amended for Maharashtra.

25 Jan 2006

The plaintiff, International Association of Lions Club (Lions Club International), filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a perpetual injunctio...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)