Search Results for "time-frame"

132 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 132 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Education Officer to Decide Reimbursement Claims Under Section 12 of RTE Act, 2009 Within Four Weeks. School Management's Claims for Reimbursement of Fees for Students Admitted Under the RTE Act Must Be Decided Expeditiously to Fulfill the Purpose of the Act.

The petitioners, a school management and its trust, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Kolhapur seeking a direction for reimburseme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Inspection Order Under Section 28 of Maharashtra Rent Act. Landlord's Application for Measurement of Tenanted Premises Allowed to Ascertain Area for Reconstruction Undertaking Under Section 16(6)(d).

The petitioners, tenants of suit premises, challenged an order passed by the Judge, Small Causes Court, Bombay, allowing the respondent landlord's app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Foreign Company Failed to Comply with Registration Requirements Under Sections 592 and 599 of Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner, a foreign company with a place of business in India, cannot maintain a winding-up petition without registering under the Act.

The petitioner, Willis Europe B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with its principal place of business in the United Kingdo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in 50:50 Joint Venture Due to Availability of Buy-Out Remedy. Loss of mutual trust and confidence does not automatically justify winding up under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 when one party is willing to purchase the other's shares.

The petitioner, Severn Trent Water Purification Inc, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 against Capital Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Remand Order in Land Conversion Appeal — Directs Appellate Authority to Decide on Merits Within 30 Days Under Section 32(3) of Land Revenue Code. Appellate Authority Cannot Remand Matter Back to Collector; Must Dispose of Appeal Within Statutory Timeframe.

The petitioners, owners of property in Margao, Goa, filed an application for conversion of land use under the Land Revenue Code on 22.9.2003. Under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Shareholder Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Arising from Share Subscription and Shareholders' Agreement.

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising out of disputes between...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Shareholder Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator. Court appoints sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from Share Subscription Agreement and Shareholders Agreement.

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising out of disputes between...