Search Results for "time barred"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "time barred"

5363 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5363 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

21 Jan 2026

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner in Property Dispute and Electricity Disconnection Case Due to Time-Barred Municipal Action and Violation of Court Order. BBMP's Cancellation of Khata After 20 Years Held Time-Barred Under Section 114A of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, and BESCOM's Disconnection Notice Quashed for Disregarding Interim Status Quo Order.

26 Feb 2026

The dispute involved two consolidated writ petitions concerning property rights and administrative actions. The petitioner had acquired Flat No. 3 in ...

High Court

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Tenancy Act Case Due to Unreasonable Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Notice Issued After 14 Years Regarding Land Transactions Was Barred as Statutory Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time Under Sections 63 and 84C of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

21 Jan 2026

The petitioners, constrained to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenged a show cause notice dated 12.12.201...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Liquidator's Appeal on Limitation Grounds in Insolvency Proceeding. Limitation period under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 runs from the date the order is made available, not from pronouncement, applying Section 420(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 50 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 for free copies.

22 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 13 July 2020, which dismissed the appellant's appeal as ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Endorsement Rejecting SVLDRS Payment, Holds Limitation Extended Due to COVID-19 Supreme Court Orders. Payment made on 30.09.2020 under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, beyond notified deadline of 30.06.2020, held valid as Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance and extended limitation for all proceedings from 15.03.2020 till further orders.

20 Aug 2024

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of an endorsement dated 13.01.2022 and a directio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Redevelopment Dispute – Plaintiff Seeks Eviction of Remaining Occupants under Development Agreement. Court Addresses Whether Non-Cooperating Occupants Can Be Compelled to Vacate Pending Suit Where Majority Have Already Vacated.

16 Oct 2025

This matter arises from an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Ambit Life Style Homes LLP, in a suit for enforcement of a registered developme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Leave to Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Dishonour of Cheque Due to Account Closed. Court holds that dishonour of cheque on ground of 'account closed' constitutes an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the complainant need not prove that the cheque was presented within validity period if the accused fails to raise the issue at trial.

14 Oct 2013

The applicant, M/s. V. A. Enterprises, through its proprietor Ashok Pundalik Suryavanshi, filed a criminal application seeking leave to appeal against...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Electricity Board Against MSEFC Awards Due to Limitation — Limitation Period Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to MSMED Act Awards. Delay of 120 days cannot be condoned as per Section 34(3) proviso, and no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the applications to set aside the awards.

27 Aug 2018

The case involves nine commercial appeals filed by various micro and small enterprises (appellants) against the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Share Dispute Due to Limitation and Lack of Urgency. Plaintiff's claim for declaration of share ownership and rectification of register barred by limitation under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 as cause of action arose in 1998 but suit filed in 2008.

16 Mar 2017

The plaintiff, Messer Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in British Virgin Islands, filed a suit in 2008 seeking a declaration that it is the ow...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Second Appeal Against Decree Granting Declaration and Possession; Operative Part Missing. The appeal challenges the first appellate court's reversal of the trial court's dismissal, but the judgment's conclusion is not provided.

27 Apr 2026

The dispute involves a regular second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the appellants (original defendants) bef...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)