WRIT PETITION NO.256 OF 2012
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "timber tax"
112 result(s) found
Found 112 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Reference on Whether Mathadi Act Applies Only to Casually Engaged Workers; Considers Statutory Definition of Unprotected Worker Under Section 2(11)
30 Aug 2006Background: A group of writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various employers including Kay Kay Embroideries P. Ltd., Bhulwalka S...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines MCD's Recovery Notices Against MEPIDL for Territorial Overreach. Cross-Petitions on Attachment of Assets Outside Delhi Under DMC Act, 1957.
1 Feb 2023The dispute arose from a contract dated 28th September 2017 between MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MEPIDL), a Mumbai-based enterprise, and the...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by NWKRTC Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Cross Objections Dismissed. Negligence of Deceased Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Applicable, and Multiplier Correctly Applied Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
23 Aug 2013The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 24.12.2006 involving a KSRTC bus (driven by respondent No.4, Manjunath) and a stationary NWKRTC...
- 45
High Court
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Attachment of Properties Under PMLA, 2002 — Confirms Provisional Attachment Orders for Alleged Money Laundering in Hawala Transactions. The court held that the properties attached were proceeds of crime derived from scheduled offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Section 5(1).
5 Aug 2010The judgment pertains to three appeals filed by Radha Mohan Lakhotia, Radha Mohan Lakhotia (HUF), and Mrs. Asha Lakhotia against the order of the Appe...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against MSRDC. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience for restraining the respondent from dealing with the suit plots.
18 Nov 2022The judgment pertains to two appeals filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, against an order dated 22.12.2021 passed by the learned...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.
18 Jul 2013The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...
- 54
High Court
- 54
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Company and Directors in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Lack of CBI Jurisdiction. Registration of FIR Without Involvement of Public Servant and Based on RBI Master Circular Held Without Authority, and Section 120B IPC Cannot Apply Standalone.
30 Sep 2022The case involved Associate Lumbers Private Limited and its directors, who had availed loan facilities from Corporation Bank (later Union Bank of Indi...
- 16
