Search Results for "testimony credibility"

930 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 930 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole reliance on testimony of interested witnesses and failure to hold Test Identification Parade rendered identification doubtful.

The case pertains to the murder of Ketan Bansode and Siddiq Arkate on 14th August 2014 at around 9:30 PM near a hotel in Talwade, Pune. The first info...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Goa Children's Act, 2003 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Devilal Kurmi, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa at Panaji for offences under Sections 2(y)(i) and 2(y)(ii) pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(ii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pradeep H. Harwalkar, a Junior Passenger Assistant with Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., was convicted by the Special Court for CBI in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sakharam Sitaram Bhise, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli in Sessions Trial Case No. 72/2010 for offences punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Inconsistency with Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and testimony lacked corroboration.

The appellant, Ganesh Baban Solankar, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, in Sessions Case No. 71 of 2006 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as evidence of PW-1 Maruti Koli was inconsistent and lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Yusuf Alamash Daryavardi (appellant No.1) and Arjun Bhima Jadhav (appellant No.2), were convicted by the Sessions Court, Sangli, for o...