Search Results for "summons quashed"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "summons quashed"

1147 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1147 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Challenge to Cooperative Court Order in Election Dispute — Interim Relief to Directors Upheld. Cooperative Court has jurisdiction under Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 to grant interim relief to maintain status quo pending adjudication of dispute regarding removal of directors.

5 May 2026

The petitioner, The Amravati District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 14.05.2025 passed by the Coo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Summons Issued by DGGI Ahmedabad to Petitioners in Maharashtra for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Summons under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 must be issued by an officer having jurisdiction over the place of business of the person summoned.

28 Mar 2024

The petitioners, Shantanu Sanjay Hundekari, Vikas Agarwal, Yogesh Agarwal, and Mamta Gupta, are residents of Maharashtra and their place of business i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of SVLDR Scheme Declaration — Petitioner Held Eligible Despite Summons Under CGST Act. Communication dated 2nd February 2020 rejecting declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 quashed as summons under Section 174 of CGST Act does not constitute 'investigation' under Section 121(e) of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019.

13 Jun 2022

The petitioner, M/s. Anjali Services Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in providing outdoor catering ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Summons Against Accused Not Named in Police Report Under Section 190(1)(b) CrPC. Magistrate Cannot Summon Persons Not Named in Police Report or Column (2) of Report, Proper Course is Under Section 319 CrPC After Evidence Collection.

16 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal concerning the power of a Magistrate to summon an individual not named in a police report under Section 190(1)(b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Complainant's Appeals in Criminal Summoning Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Sessions Court and High Court Correctly Quashed Summons Against Company Executives as Prima Facie Case Not Made Out Under Sections 427, 447, 506, and 120B read with Section 34 IPC.

27 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a private complaint filed by the original complainant against thirteen accused, including companies and their executives, for o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Written Statement — Delay of 9 years and 79 days condoned subject to costs of Rs.15,000/- as sufficient cause shown and no prejudice caused to plaintiff.

10 Oct 2019

The petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.21,00,000/- paid as part consideration for purchase of a flat. The suit was dismissed in defa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commercial Appeal Against Refusal to Amend Arbitration Petition — Amendment Sought to Challenge Arbitral Award as Nullity Rejected as Time-Barred and Without Merit. The Court held that an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not maintainable against an order refusing amendment of a petition, and the amendment was rightly rejected as it was sought after the limitation period had expired.

7 Apr 2017

The case involves a Commercial Appeal filed by Zee Sports Ltd. (now Zee Digital Convergance Ltd.) against Nimbus Media Pte. Ltd. under Section 37 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes De Novo Trial Order in Summary Case — Section 326(3) CrPC Does Not Mandate Retrial When Evidence Already Recorded by Predecessor Magistrate. Successor Magistrate Can Proceed from Stage of Final Arguments.

17 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Ulhas s/o Fulchand Rathod, was being tried in Summary Criminal Case No. 597/2008 for offences under Sections 143, 294, 341, 504, 506 o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons to Arbitrator in Section 34 Proceedings — Arbitrator Not a Necessary Party Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator cannot be arrayed as defendant in arbitration suit challenging award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Sri H.N.M. Prasad, a practicing advocate, acted as an arbitrator and passed an arbitral award on 10.3.2015 in a dispute between Smt. V...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused's Petition in Section 138 NI Act Case — Summons to Accused to Produce Documents Quashed as Violative of Right Against Self-Incrimination. The court held that a complainant cannot compel the accused to produce documents in his custody to rebut the defence, as it infringes Article 20(3) of the Constitution.

19 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Mahendrakumar Kanhyalal Jain, was the accused in Summary Criminal Case No. 3061/2003 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Cla...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)