Search Results for "subsequent purchasers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "subsequent purchasers"

711 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 711 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Against Witness in Land Dispute Case — No Prima Facie Case for Criminal Breach of Trust or Cheating. Witness's Role Limited to Signing Sale Deed Does Not Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406, 420, 423, 120-B IPC.

20 Mar 2026

The present application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) for quashing of FIR being C.R. No.1-576 of 2007 reg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Stamp Duty Classification Dispute — Development Agreement Not a Conveyance Under Article 25 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Court holds that a development agreement conferring development rights without transferring ownership is chargeable under Article 5(g-a) and not Article 25.

11 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Suhas Damodar Sathe, filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 3rd June 2017 pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Construction in Property Dispute Among Family Members. Alleged Breach of Development Agreement and Illegal Construction on Common Property Leads to Status Quo Order.

26 Apr 2022

The dispute arises out of a family arrangement among the Motwane family members regarding a larger property at Khar, Mumbai. On 31st March, 1990, the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial court's refusal to grant specific performance of agreement to sell as plaintiffs failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform their part of contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

22 Oct 2019

The dispute pertains to a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 18-04-2005 concerning agricultural land bearing Khasara No.40, P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Preliminary Agreement Not Amounting to Conveyance — Agreement for Sale Without Immediate Possession Not Deemed Conveyance Under Article 25(b) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The court held that a preliminary agreement for sale where possession is not delivered immediately cannot be treated as a conveyance under Explanation I to Article 25 of Schedule I of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

17 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Narendra Janardan Pathak and others, entered into a 'preliminary agreement' dated 21 February 2011 with the respondents-vendors for t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Order in Land Reforms Act Case — Upholds Grant of Occupancy Rights to Tenants Based on Consistent Evidence of Cultivation.

9 Jul 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Yusuff Ali Khan and others) challenging the order dated 30.11.2007 passed by the Land T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration and injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

24 Jan 2018

The appellant, Aravind S/o Krishnaji Kulkarni, filed Regular Second Appeal No.161/2002 against the judgment and decree dated 4.9.2001 passed in R.A.No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiffs Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. Court held that disputed questions of title and possession cannot be decided in injunction proceedings without proper evidence.

17 Jan 2013

The present appeals arise from a property dispute between M/s Girdhar Creations and others (original plaintiffs) and Baban Baburao Rathare and others ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Held to Be Leave and Licence, Not Sale. Court upholds finding that the agreement dated 22 April 1977 was a sham document and the transaction was a leave and licence arrangement, not an agreement for sale.

9 Jun 2011

The Appellant, M/s. Imageads and Communications Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 22 April 1977, claiming that Re...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)