Search Results for "shopping complex"

203 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 430 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Builder's Challenge to Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction in Chennai. Court Holds Regularization is Not an Absolute Right; Unauthorized Commercial Floors Constructed Beyond Approved Plan Must Be Demolished Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act.

The petitioner, a construction company, challenged a removal notice issued by the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) dated 28.11.2023, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Permanent Disability and Loss of Income. The court enhanced compensation from Rs.1,10,000 to Rs.5,14,735 for injuries sustained in a head-on collision between a bus and a truck.

The appellant, Ranjit Arunkumar Jaiswal, was a 29-year-old businessman running a Funfair and Mini Bazar. On 15/11/1997, he was travelling in a luxury ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order of Status Quo and Appointment of Receiver in Property Dispute. Court Holds That Suit for Declaration and Injunction Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata and That Receiver Cannot Be Removed Without Proper Application.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (Afzal Khan and others) against the appellants (Mehboob Ayub Khan and others) seeking declarati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Caveat in Execution Proceedings — Caveat Under Section 148A CPC Not Maintainable After Execution Application Is Filed. Court Holds That Assignee Decree-Holder Can Execute Decree Without Notice to Judgment-Debtor Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioners, who are judgment-debtors in a pending execution application, filed a caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows CMDA Appeal in Premium FSI Charges Dispute — Guideline Value Prevailing on Date of Approval Governs Levy. Builder's Application for Additional FSI Does Not Confer Right to Pre-Revised Rate.

The appellant, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), challenged the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court which directe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2013

The petitioners, retired employees of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, along with other slum dwellers, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...