Search Results for "secured creditor"

555 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 555 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Application — Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares Held as Debt, Not Investment. The Court held that CRPS constitute a debt under Section 3(11) of IBC, 2016, and the appellant is a financial creditor entitled to file an application under Section 7.

The appeal arises from the dismissal of the appellant's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by the NCLT and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Priority Dispute Between SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act. SARFAESI Act's Express Priority Provisions Under Section 26E Prevail Over MSMED Act's Recovery Mechanism, as No Conflict Exists and Priority Must Be Expressly Provided.

The dispute arose from conflicting recovery claims under the SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act against a debtor, Mission Vivacare, which had defaulted on loa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SARFAESI Auction Case, Reinstating DRT Order and Sale. High Court's Writ Jurisdiction Improper When Statutory Remedy Available; Auction Deposit Complied with Rules and Property Not Exempt as Agricultural Land Under Section 31(i) SARFAESI Act.

The dispute arose from securitisation proceedings initiated by Indian Bank against M/s. Raus Constructions Private Ltd. after loan default. The bank c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order for Release of Secured Asset on Partial Payment Under SARFAESI Act. The court held that Section 13(8) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 requires full payment of dues for redemption, and partial payment does not entitle the borrower to reclaim the property.

The dispute arose between a bank, as secured creditor, and a borrower over the enforcement of security interest under the Securitisation and Reconstru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Against Labour Court Orders in Recovery Proceedings Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Held That Assignee Bank Steps Into Shoes of Transferor and Is Liable for Pre-Transfer Claims of Workmen.

The petitioners, the Authorized Officer and Chairman & Managing Director of IDBI Bank (Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund), filed four writ petitions ...