Search Results for "section 323"

2127 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2127 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal Against Lokayukta Enquiry Order — Enquiry Under Section 12(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Cannot Be Initiated Without Preliminary Verification Under Section 12(1) and (2).

The appellant, an Assistant Engineer in the Public Works Department, challenged an order of the learned Single Judge dismissing his writ petition agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC Due to Lack of Strong Evidence. Court Holds That Mere Witness Deposition Reiterating Police Statements Is Insufficient to Summon Accused Who Were Previously Discharged After Investigation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Rajesh and others against the judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, which had confirmed the Trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Due to Vague Allegations. Court Holds that Filing of General and Omnibus Allegations Against Husband and In-Laws Constitutes Abuse of Process of Law Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

The petitioners, husband and his family members (father, mother, brother), sought quashing of FIR registered at Basavanagudi Women Police Station, Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Eligibility Communication Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Interpretation of Section 9(c) of DTVSV Act: Pending criminal proceedings without charge-sheet or not relating to tax matters do not bar eligibility.

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of a communication dated 21st October 2020 issued by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Atrocity Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Sections 332, 504, 506(2) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Deter Public Servant from Duty.

The appellant, Jadeja Mahipatsinh Dhulaji, was convicted by the learned Special Judge, Joint District Court, Patan on 01.04.2005 in Special Atrocity C...