Search Results for "section 23(3)"

613 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 613 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Probate — Secondary Evidence of Will Held Admissible Despite Non-Production of Original. Attestation Proved Through Scribe's Son and Attesting Witness's Daughter; Delay and Exclusion of Heirs Not Suspicious.

The present appeal was filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the original Opponents against the judgment d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Stop Work Notice and Demolition Order in Cantonment Area — Holds That Repair of Old Grant Bungalow Does Not Require Prior Permission Under Revised Land Policy of 1995.

The petitioners, legal heirs of late Smt. Homai Nussarwanji Pudumjee, were occupancy holders of bungalow No.6, Maneckji Mehta Road, Pune, an old grant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of 77 FIRs Against Credit Society Office Bearers to Single MPID Court for Consolidated Trial. Multiplicity of proceedings avoided to ensure fair and expeditious trial under Section 406 CrPC and MPID Act.

The petitioners, office bearers and employees of Bhaichand Hirachand Raisoni Multi State Credit Society, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Correctly Held Commissioner Not Justified Under Section 263 for Alleged Double Deduction of Excise Duty. Assessing Officer Followed Permissible View and Assessee Did Not Claim Deduction Twice.

The present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Upholds Preferential Transaction Findings in Insolvency Case — Two Transactions Totaling Rs. 1.60 Crore Held as Preferential Under Section 43 of IBC, 2016. The Tribunal Confirms That Payments Made to Related Parties During the Look-Back Period Are Voidable and Must Be Reversed.

The case involves an appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by H.P. Arun Kumar, C.M. Nagaraj, and Usha (Appellants...