Search Results for "review dismissed"

5370 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5370 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in MSMED Act Arbitration Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner's alternative remedy by way of appeal was availed and withdrawn, and no grounds for review exist.

The petitioner, Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a supplier under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), had co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 5 of Arbitration Act. Review Petition Against Order Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Not Maintainable as Review Not Provided Under Part I of the Act.

The petitioner, M/s Madhav Structural Engineering Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd.,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Land Acquisition Compensation Case - No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review jurisdiction limited to error apparent on record; compensation at Rs.120 per square yard upheld.

The Supreme Court of India, exercising its inherent jurisdiction, considered multiple review petitions filed against its earlier judgment in Civil App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of order allowing impleadment of sister in partition suit rejected as preliminary decree not yet passed and impleadment does not affect finality of decree.

The applicants, original petitioners in Writ Petition No.288/2024, filed a review application (Civil Application (Review) No.10/2026) before the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Review Order in Urban Land Ceiling Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Jurisdiction Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC Cannot Be Used to Re-Examine Factual Findings Like an Appellate Court.

The appeal arose from a review order passed by the Allahabad High Court dismissing a review application filed by the original appellant, Asharfi Devi ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blacklisting Order in Sand Ghat Auction — Review Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Divisional Commissioner's Order Quashed as Petitioner Was Not Afforded Opportunity of Hearing Before Adverse Decision.

The petitioner, Raju Leeladhar Sawwalakhe, a businessman involved in sand excavation for about 20 years, participated in an auction of sand ghats cond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Death Sentence Case Under IPC Sections 302 and 449 - Review jurisdiction limited to errors apparent on the record; no rehearing or re-appreciation of evidence permitted under Article 137 of the Constitution and Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

The Supreme Court of India, in a review petition filed under Article 137 of the Constitution, dismissed a challenge to its earlier judgment affirming ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Appeal Against Review Order Permitting Tenant to Amend Written Statement in Rent Suit. Amendment Sought After Trial Decree and After Rejection of Earlier Amendment Application, Not Allowed as It Would Circumvent Finality of Decree.

The case arises from a suit for eviction filed by the landlord (appellants) against the tenant (respondents) for default in payment of rent from April...