Search Results for "revenue income"

2676 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2676 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case for Notified Person Under Special Court Act. Interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of Income Tax Act, 1961 not chargeable due to assets being vested in Custodian.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which held that the assessee, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Case, Holding Voluntary Return Below Taxable Limit is a Valid Return. Assessment Completed Beyond Four Years of Assessment Year Under Section 34(1) Notice Was Invalid as No Income Had Escaped Assessment.

The case involved an assessee, Ranchhoddas Karsondas, who submitted a voluntary return of income for the assessment year 1945-46 on January 5, 1950, d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Tribunal's concurrent findings on non-concealment of income and non-furnishing of inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld.

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assessee's Right to Carry Forward Loss as Vocation Income Under Income-tax Act, 1922. Hold that Decision on Loss in Previous Year Not Binding on Subsequent Year's Officer Under Section 24(2).

The assessee, Manmohandas, was appointed as Treasurer of a Bank in respect of certain branches, sub-agencies, and pay offices. During the previous yea...