Search Results for "reopening accounts"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "reopening accounts"

176 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 176 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Reassessment Notice Invalid Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure. Arbitration Award Receipt Held as Capital Receipt, Not Income Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

8 Nov 2023

The appellant, Ramona Pinto, an individual, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order dated 2nd April 2018 pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Valid Reason to Believe in Income Tax Act Case. Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 set aside as the Assessing Officer failed to form an independent opinion and relied on borrowed satisfaction from investigation wing without proper application of mind.

9 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Saurashtra Infra & Power Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in infrastructure development and running a Container Freight Station, filed its...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reopening Case — CBDT's Rejection of Assessee's Objection Upheld. The Court held that the Assessing Officer's satisfaction based on tangible material is sufficient for reopening under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the Single Judge erred in quashing the reopening notice.

2 Jul 2021

The present writ appeal arises out of an order dated 6.1.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.18419/2018 (Vasudev Adigas Fast Foods Pvt.L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging FEMA Show Cause Notices Against BCCI President. Section 42 of FEMA applies to persons in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of a company, and the petitioner as President is covered.

7 Aug 2013

The petitioner, Shashank Vyankatesh Manohar, was the President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) from 2008 to 2011. During this peri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case — Change of Opinion Not Permissible Beyond Four Years. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Set Aside as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Was Alleged.

14 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Shriram Foundry Ltd., challenged a notice dated 10 February 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reason to Believe — Mere Change of Opinion Not Sufficient for Reassessment. The court held that the Assessing Officer had already applied his mind to the depreciation claim during original assessment and the subsequent reopening on the same issue without fresh tangible material was impermissible.

20 Oct 2011

The petitioner, Indo European Breweries Ltd., challenged a notice dated 17 March 2011 issued under Section 148(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices in Sales Tax Case Due to Lack of Reasonable Belief — Reopening Based on Mere Suspicion and Incomplete Information Held Invalid Under Section 35 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and Rule 9A of Central Sales Tax (Bombay) Rules, 1957.

15 Apr 2010

The petitioners, Shree Venkateshwara Petro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reason to Believe — Amount Received on Retirement from Partnership Firm Held to be Capital Receipt Not Chargeable to Tax.

22 Feb 2010

The petitioners, Prashant S. Joshi and Dattaram Shridhar Bhosale, were partners in a real estate development partnership firm. They retired from the p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Mere Change of Opinion Invalid. Reassessment Based on Same Commencement Certificate Date Already Considered in Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Cannot Be Sustained.

19 Jan 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Mistry Lalji Narsi Development Corporation, a partnership firm engaged in development and construction, challenged a notice issue...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal Against Inclusion of Interest Credits as Taxable Income Under Section 4(1)(a) of Income-tax Act, 1922. Mercantile System Credit Entries for Interest from Own Shop in Native State Treated as Income Received in British India.

3 Oct 1958

The assessee, ordinarily resident in British India, carried on business at Khurja and Aligarh in India and at Chistian in the Indian State of Bahawalp...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)