Search Results for "rehabilitation act"

1452 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1452 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Koyna Project-Affected Persons Seeking Rehabilitation Land — Cancellation of Allotment Without Hearing Set Aside. State Directed to Allot Alternative Land Within Six Weeks as Petitioners' Eligibility Was Undisputed.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Waman Ganpatrao Kadam, owned lands in Velhe, Satara, acquired for the Koyna Project in 1961. They claimed they receive...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Land Reserved for Garden Since 1976 — Award Under Section 23 of RFCTLARR Act 2013 Quashed as Acquisition Not Completed Within Statutory Period

The petitioners, owners of land in Kankavali, challenged the reservation of their land for a garden under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by State of Kerala and Corporation in Abkari Workers Rehabilitation Case. Upholds High Court's Direction to Implement 2002 Government Order for Employment of Displaced Workers, Finding Modification Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The case involves appeals by the State of Kerala and Kerala State Beverages (M and M) Corporation Limited against a Division Bench judgment of the Ker...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — Directs Deposit of Rs.12.5 Crores and Appointment of Court Receiver. Clause 6 of MOU for Refund on Default Forms Basis for Interim Relief Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, four individuals, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the respondent, a developer, on 29 July 2011 for development ...